Private Taxation — American Healthcare
April 1, 2008
The answer to our unique American set of issues is not a single issue proposed solution, but a sea change in our premise: either we are a nation of people and laws to protect, defend and promote the health, safety and welfare of all our citizens or we are a vehicle for corporate interests that will do anything to maintain their positions of power and profit. Getting rid of the influence of lobbyists and the effect of campaign contributions on candidates is not some lofty ambition or ideal; it is an imperative that is the ONLY answer to having food on the table, gas in the tank and a roof over our heads.
A candidate for public office must (a) spend the time to learn about economics (b) demonstrate their independence from special interests, (c) demonstrate their proficiency in understanding how economic trends impact the average voter and (d) educate the voter as to how economic policies are being used against them and what they can do about it.
BEWARE OF PLATITUDES AND QUICK FIX PROPOSALS THAT WILL NOT WORK AND CANNOT DELIVER RELIEF TO THE HOME OR DINNER TABLE.
Prospective voters who are considering support for candidates for public office or propositions and petitions having economic consequences are stuck between a rock and a hard place. The growing realization is that, in particularly in a global economy, some complex events are somehow having an effect on their daily lives.
In the absence of any real information for each voter to make their own decision they are forced to rely on “mainstream” news, which is more fact based entertainment than informative, candidates who will say anything to get elected, and special interest advertising that mischaracterizes the choices.
Voters understand that food, fuel and medical costs are taking away more and more of their income with the same effect as if a new tax was enacted requiring them to fund the largest corporations in the world, whose losses are covered by taxpayers and whose windfall profits are closely guarded from consumers who don’t get the benefit of cost reductions, stockholders who don’t get the benefit of dividends, and merchants who don’t get the benefit of sales revenue from people who don’t have anymore money to spend.
These “ private taxes” are reflective of the growing pattern of privatizing public finance. In short they are private taxes sanctioned by federal, state and local governments who themselves are victims of the pattern. In my opinion this represents “PRIVATE TAXATION” sanctioned by government.
Let’s look at some of the “proposals” for healthcare that are offered and watch how they work.
- American citizens spend more (35%-250%) on drugs, medical protocols,, tests and treatment than any other country in the world. The same drugs that cost $20 per pill in the U.S. can be purchased for $2.00 elsewhere. Protocols that would prevent disease or would cure them are virtually banned or are allowed to be “not covered” by insurance — resulting in the average person my age (61) taking thousands of pills per year that people in other countries are not taking because they don’t need them and because the pills themselves present risks of side effects that include everything up to and including death.
- The financial excesses of the medical-pharmaceutical-insurance industry is supported by “laws” that protect the industry and which little or nothing to do with the health of any person. These excesses are present ONLY in the United States.
- At the same time that we are spending more, we are suffering more medical disasters in more families every day. Longevity (life-span) in the United States is declining. Infant mortality is rising. Even average adult height has decreased in the Untied States and is now lower than many other countries.
- Protocols like chelation IV therapy, food supplements and vitamins, gene therapy, human stem cell therapy, and primitive cell therapy are being used all over the world, growing back diseased or missing organs, improving overall health, and improving vitality while at the same time vastly reducing the demands for medical treatment. Those other countries are spending less and delivering more. Several third world countries have now become centers for medical care of those Americans who have the money, time and physical ability to reach them.
- National programs for health and fitness are not only improving physical health, but the all important index of happiness and contentment.
- Ideological arguments against these other systems are bogus arguments designed to distract American voters from the truth: the system is working here for those looking to earn a profit, whereas the system is working elsewhere in the world for those seeking to maintain a healthy population.
- The ideological argument against a single payer that negotiates prices, seeks preventative national programs and pursues the best possible treatments and cures is merely a hammer to threaten and frighten people with the prospect of “socialism” which most people translate as a loss of freedom, constant fear of government, loss of privacy, and a lack of disposable income at the end of the month.
- The truth is that all societies practice socialism as to those services that the government elects to provide. In the United States, taxes are used to pay for military, police, fire, education etc. In an ultimate irony, the heavy reliance on ideological argument over common sense has resulted in the the outcome most feared by those who are cajoled into voting against their interests: loss of freedom, constant fear of government, loss of privacy, and a lack of disposable income at the end of the month.
- The surrender of our healthcare to profit motivated private interests, like the surrender of prison management to private interests, like the surrender of regulation of sales of securities, creation of credit, expansion of monetary supply to private interests has led to a corporatocracy that threatens to consume the last dollar of every “average” American leaving them not only with no disposable income at the end of the month, but rather in debt up to their ears.
- Meanwhile the countries with “high” tax rates (which can simply be translated as honest transparency, as opposed to hiding the taxes in your utility bills, and covering up the private power of taxation given to corporate America) have satisfied, happy, free, contented populations who get along just fine and their citizens are not in debt and who are able to save up money and pay for things in cash.
American citizens have the exclusive right to vote in what should be a free society, but instead they are confronted with a corporate-government set of rules where the opportunities and choices are closing in on the the average guy or girl who is just trying to get through the month.
Our incomes are being used to fund corporate losses, corporate abandonment of our own population for employment and training, military adventures that are funded by borrowing (which is future taxation), and huge windfall profits of oil companies, agricultural companies receiving “subsidies”, pharmaceutical companies, and insurance companies.
The answer to our problems is not a single issue proposed solution, but a sea change in our premise: either we are a nation of people and laws to protect, defend and promote the health, safety and welfare of our citizens or we are a vehicle for corporate interests that will do anything to maintain their positions of power and profit. Getting rid of the influence of lobbyists and the effect of campaign contributions on candidates is not some lofty ambition or ideal; it is an imperative that is the ONLY answer to having food on the table, gas in the tank and a roof over our heads.
April 1, 2008 at 6:45 pm
[...] Katherine Blauvelt wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]
April 1, 2008 at 7:27 pm
[...] Angela Szesciorka wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThese “ private taxes” are reflective of the growing pattern of privatizing public finance. In short they are private taxes sanctioned by federal, state and local governments who themselves are victims of the pattern. … [...]
April 1, 2008 at 8:03 pm
I strongly believe the reason the White House lies and people die is to repay the pharmaceutical companies for supporting the elections. Stem Cell Therapy is done around the world with remarkable success rates and my husband died waiting. Am I bitter? You bet I am. We were to leave the country but the demand from so many Americans seeking care abroad lengthened the wait list and his heart gave out a few weeks before the 4 Mar schedule date for therapy. This was to use his own blood, nothing foreign and nothing at all to do with embryos or killing babies. They lie, people die! The truth needs to be told. I am happy to share research and information.
April 1, 2008 at 8:03 pm
April 1, 2008 at 8:03 pm
I strongly believe the reason the White House lies and people die is to repay the pharmaceutical companies for supporting the elections. Stem Cell Therapy is done around the world with remarkable success rates and my husband died waiting. Am I bitter? You bet I am. We were to leave the country but the demand from so many Americans seeking care abroad lengthened the wait list and his heart gave out a few weeks before the 4 Mar schedule date for therapy. This was to use his own blood, nothing foreign and nothing at all to do with embryos or killing babies. They lie, people die! The truth needs to be told. I am happy to share research and information.
April 1, 2008 at 8:29 pm
[...] livinglies has a reputation for providing reliable and awe-inspiring information. Check out the latest post on Private Taxation â [...]
April 3, 2008 at 12:59 pm
I admire your overall message about the unethical practices of private taxation and how it is ripping off the American people to generate wealth for large corporate interests. However, I find your comment regarding human stem cell therapy a bit misleading. Currently, we use human stem cell therapy (i.e., bone marrow transplants) in this country quite successfully. We shouldn’t confuse human stem cell therapy, however, with embryonic stem cell therapy. Embryonic stem cell research is, unfortunately, part of the private taxations scam since several states have implemented public funds to support this research, even without voter approval, as in the state of Connecticut. Its therapeutic potential has been far over-stated. In fact, realistically embryonic stem cells have potential to only benefit the pharmaceutical industry in drug discovery and scientifically have very little to no realistic chance to ever becoming a human therapeutic agent. Therefore, the immediate monetary benefits of embryonic stem cell research go directly to the drug company’s pockets at the tax payers expense. The sell to the American people of embryonic stem cell’s overstated therapeutic potential is horrifyingly unethical, not only to the public who have to pay for it to make pharmaceutical companies richer, but also to the poor patients and family who think that it will ever be developed to provide them therapeutic hope. Gene therapy is another overstated therapy which has failed miserably and has been involved in several unethical human experimental clinical trials resulting in deaths and which has costs the American people millions (if not billions?) of dollars over the last 25 years.
April 3, 2008 at 2:50 pm
EDITOR’S COMMENT: STEM CELL IS A HOT TOPIC. I knew that when I wrote the piece. However the comment from “watchdogonscience” contains inaccurate facts. First only some of the bone marrow transplant has worked and none of it has worked for lung disorders. It also is quite troublesome on the issue of rejection when the marrow comes from another human being. It is not yet “quite successful” because of a variety of absurd and sometimes dangerous side effects (cancer etc). Embryonic stem cell research, still in its infancy is far more promising under the latest advances. It avoids the pitfalls and pain and risks of bone marrow extraction, and allows true differentiation into specific organs which in many countries has resulted in the regeneration of organ function and sometimes the organ itself. The comment about the drug companies wanting stem cell therapy is wrong. They want gene therapy but not stem cells. Stem cell therapy and other forms of cell therapy from animals threatens their revenue far more than any regulation or other external event. By getting Bush to veto stem cells in this country the drug companies shot themselves in the foot. The protocol is now developed in the UK, China, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Mexico and several other countries. The price structure has been developed without any input from the major drug companies. Hence a person receiving a successful stem cell treatment and eliminating diabetes from their current health condition is likely to avoid more than $200,000 in health care costs including medications from pharmaceutical companies. The cost of stem cell therapy varies from $15,000 to about $45,000 and the cells themselves cost only around $7,000. It is not hard to see why the pharmaceutical companies are putting out disinformation about stem cells and stoking the religious fires to maintain opposition. Stem cell therapy, far from “making the pharmaceutical companies richer” threatens their legislative and market dominance. And insurance companies and government health care programs, faced with decreasing health care costs, will be under pressure to reduce premiums. You must remember the simple American health care formula: if insurance covers it, it gets done. Insurance only covers it if the overall revenue and profit picture for big pharma and insurance is maintained or enhanced.
April 3, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Your are correct that human stem cell or bone marrow transplants are limited in their ability as treatment options especially regarding rejection issues. But the ability of developing embryonic stem cells to fill this void is just not reasonably feasible. Since I have personally been involved in stem cell research, I can highlight three points that you might want to consider.
1. Most, if not all large pharmaceutical company today are working in embryonic stem cell research. If you do not believe me, write a letter to every big drug company and ask them directly. You will see that this is a fact. Pharmaceutical companies use embryonic stem cells to create “disease state models” to find more drugs. More drugs means more money.
2. The development of advanced genetic engineering technologies is the true power house behind embryonic stem cells. With our advanced genetic potential, embryonic stem cells can be used for basic research, drug discovery and, unfortunately, for “not-so-good” purposes as germ warfare. Associated with even the “good” research, however, is a public health threat from the unregulated BL2 viruses used in Pharma and academia to genetically modify human embryonic stem cells. Another realistic and disturbing possibility of using advanced genetic technologies with embryonic stem cells is the ability to clone humans. Theoretically, it is technically easier to clone a human beig than to find a therapeutic cure to a disease (i.e., Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, etc.) from embryonic stem cell technologies. Cloning human life has horrifying ethical repercussions.
3. Despite the great advances in genetic advances, embryonic stem cell technologies are still very unlikely to be developed a successful therapeutic agent. The scientific limitation of the embryonic stem cell technology is due to a severe lack of understanding of what scientists call “differentiation”. In order to use an embryonic stem cell for a specific therapy, the researcher has to differentiate the cell into an exact and specific cell type. But this is far from simple. The mystery of differentiation is a complex phenomenon requiring positional cellular signals as the embryo divides. So trying to differentiate an embryonic stem cell in a test tube to an appropriate and safe cell type is a far reaching proposal. Not only do we not have any clear understanding of how differentiation occurs in the embryo in order to truly replicate it, but we also have no qualitative scientific method of characterizing a specific cell type. What looks like a neuron with presentation and detection of a few neuronal markers may actually NOT be a neuron. And if you do not have the correct and exact differentiated cell type, all types of ill effects, from metabolic disorders to cancer, can be produced. And even if it were possible to understand differentiation fully, then the problem of how to place the differentiated cell into the correct part of a human tissue to make it work becomes a whole other set of complexities. It is a sad fact that anyone undergoing future clinical trials with any type of embryonic stem cell therapy, better have a good last will and testament written.
I understand and feel for those who have a horrid disease and want to support embryonic stem cells in desperate hope of finding a possible cure. But unfortunately, embryonic stem cell technologies have little to no potential to be developed into any therapeutic agent, and therefore, should not be promoted as such. Doing so is unethical.
Lastly, would it be possible to check your sources regarding embryonic stem cell therapy where you say it resulted in true differentiation or regeneration of organs? I am not aware of any proven therapeutic benefits from embryonic stem cells as yet. Most developments have not been without serious side effects such as cancer. If you obtained this information off a blogsite without it being published in a peer-reviewed journal, I would be careful believing it. There are stem cell charlatans popping up in other countries in order to make a buck. They feel nothing about taking advantage of sick people searching desperately for help. But if you really do know of these scientific publications, would you be kind enough to post it for us? I do not believe they exist. I hope I am proved wrong.
April 4, 2008 at 3:56 pm
We are well aware of the charlatans including some who are picking up people in this country and bringing them to other countries for an all-inclusive fee. Unfortunately the U.S. has made it easy for them to operate because of the Federal opposition to stem cell research. Our sources are ourselves — direct personal visits, witnessing the events, albeit with promise of anonymity. The people involved are well-trained, well recognized medical professionals with completely verifiable credentials. But I can direct you to such mundane periodicals as Scientific American that recently carried a few articles on regeneration of organs. Not exactly the same thing we are talking about here, but the same idea. Google up bypass alternatives and you will probably find one of the items I am referring to — where the body naturally grew a bypass artery.
April 4, 2008 at 6:06 pm
Despite the fact that we disagree on the feasibility of obtaining any type of therapeutic cure from embryonic stem cell technologies, we still agree on your issue of private taxation. The American scientific and medical communities have taken no responsibility to ensure that publicly-funded technologies are distributed back to the public in a fair, affordable and accessible manner. That is the dilemma Mrs. Heiser faced (see her comment above) and which many other Americans are facing now, forcing us to seek medical care abroad.
We are in dire need for public awareness in bioethics to promote the use and development of medical technologies that support human welfare, human dignity and human rights. Unfortunately, many of our trained bioethicists are tied to big universities and big money. This naturally creates an inherent conflict of interest to “over-state” the potential benefits of technologies in order to get billions of dollars of public funding. And sophisticated technologies that do become therapeutically successful are then place back into a self-serving and money-driven medical industry where the average American has difficulty affording them or accessing them. In the end, the American people who with tax dollars actually pay for research which is hailed the “best in the world”, have difficulty reaping the direct benefit of it. Private taxation. You said it right.
P.S. Mrs. Heiser should publish her story. Put it on a blog or website or newspaper or somewhere. I am so sorry for her loss.